A second user review of the Aspire 5920
- posted by Michael Walsh on August 4th, 2007


- (7)
This is a great idea.
I love hearing your thoughts about all things Acer (and anything else for that matter) and in a review you give me a LOT to think about.
Hope you enjoy this second user review of the Aspire 5920 from Iain.
———————————————
As a freelance IT consultant, I need a laptop to be powerful and robust. I also get to use and play with a lot of kit, whether it be my own, my clients or suppliers.
It’s been time to replace the Compaq Evo that I’ve been using for a while. Whilst a sturdy machine, and of a size that’s not the smallest but no beast by any stretch of the imagination, it just can’t cut the mustard anymore. As I’ve said, I’ve used kit from many manufacturers over the years, and I decided that I would probably be best of taking a look at another Acer.
The last Acer I had myself was a TravelMate back about 5 years ago. It wasn’t the cheapest on the market, but it was the best bang for buck – the most powerful for my budget. Being a technical guy, power is one of the more important features. Being half a Scotsman, and self-employed, I don’t mind spending but I also like saving money!
Over the past few years, based on the experience of my Travelmate being reliable and serving me well, I’ve generally recommended Acer laptops to friends and family, and to date I’ve had no complaints, so this was yet another nod for me to choose from Acer’s range. This time round I wanted something a bit more media capable. For about 3 months I’d been eyeing up the Acer Ferrari 5005.
The Ferrari was almost perfect in my eyes – it had it all, size and performance. The price was reasonable for what you got a few months ago, but now the model is slightly older (but due to its spec still very good!). A mate went out and bought one when he saw me looking at it – and he’s been blown away by it. The thing that changed my mind though was the imminent release of Santa Rosa laptops – they promised more power and benefits at a lower cost than the Ferrari. I then came across the specs and a few pictures of the new Aspire 5920. Taking dual core Centrino processors of the new Santa Rosa variety. I liked everything I saw – and it wasn’t just cheaper the Ferrari, it was almost half the cost. The 5920 started to wipe the floor with competing products, and has already won a fair few awards from magazines and online tech sites.
Supply has been slow for this in-demand laptop. Finally, I was able to place an order this Tuesday just gone, and it arrived on Thursday. The first thing that hit me was how big the laptop is. I knew it wasn’t going to be small, but it is a little larger than I expected (but still not really huge). That said, it oozes quality. It looks substantial and not flimsy. I knew it was going to be larger than say the Ferrari – and that’s fine. At the end of the day, at the power/price point somethings got to give and I would rather have it slightly larger than lose say the graphics capability.
Being slightly larger though, Acer have made some good choices – decent size, uncluttered, keys and keyboard. Media keys/quick launch keys not cramped. Decent size trackpad and buttons. You don’t have to keep dropping the screen, turning the laptop round or bending over the top of it to get at the ports – except for the power they’ve all been positioned down the two sides and front.
On the ports front, I find it difficult to find anything that’s missing – there’s 4 USB, a firewire, line in/speaker/mic, HDMI, s-video, SVGA, Expresscard and an SD/Memory Stick port. Completing the externals on the sides are a DVD Re-writer and a volume wheel.
I say I find it difficult to find anything missing – but there is one thing. That’s a PC Card slot. This is actually fair enough – it’s an old technology that’s been replaced by the newer Expresscard, and most new laptops suffer from the same. This is only a problem in that those of us with PC Cards that we need (eg I have a 3G datacard for mobile net access). It’s not a show stopper by any stretch of the imagination, just something to be aware of.
I would have preferred buttons instead of a wheel for volume control. This is because I have a tendancy to knock the wheel. The good side though is that if the volume is turned up high as you boot/shutdown/go to a media website whilst in an inappropriate place, you can quickly knock the volume right down.
The DVD writer does it’s job perfectly. As with most laptop CD/DVD drives that slide out though, it is a little flimsy. That said, it’s not going to stay out, it’s only going to be ejected when inserting/swapping/removing a disc. Again, personal preference would have liked a slot-drive. Again, however, this laptop costs the right side of £800 and is overall of extremely good quality with a very good spec.
The “Gemstone” styling by BMW of the laptop appears to be like Marmite – you either love it or you hate it. To me, it’s great. The outside is shiny, like a gemstone. This looks good, but as with iPods, marks easily. Well, maybe not as easily as with an iPod, but you get the idea. A quick wipe with a cloth or even a sleeve soon changes that though! The inside has been the cause for the most debate though. It’s not white, it’s not beige, it’s not grey. It’s pearl. It looks slightly different under differnet light – but to me it works well. The overall styling is smart, modern and clean without being the tacky retro “futuristic” look from the 70s/80s/early 90s. It’s not a full-on-white white so it’s not Mac-i-fied. It’s also designed so the paint won’t rub off, so has to be a winner in my eyes.
The screen is the glossy crystalbrite variety. Whilst it can be difficult to use in bright sunlight, so can traditional CRT monitors, and even many matte-LCD screens. I like the vividness given by the crystalbrite-type screens. Next time you’re in Currys, look at the large screen monitors. Try and find an LCD screen and a plasma next to each other and showing the same DVD/program. Notice how much more vivid the plasma display is. Crystalbrite LCD screens to me offer that vividness over matte LCD screens.
The only disappointing thing about the 15.4″ screen for me is its maximum resolution. On a 4:3 monitor, I usually like to work at a resolution of 1600 x 1200. Before buying I knew the the 5920 could do a maximum of 1280 x 800. This I decided would be a necessary sacrifice to get a Santa Rosa laptop. Whilst the resolution is disappointing, it’s widescreen so does at least offer a bit more “real estate” than a 4:3 screen.
The graphics are supplied courtesy of a 256MB Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT DX10 card. I’ve not had too much of a chance to play with this as yet – but it’s a good spec card that can use the 1GB of Intel Robson technology turbo cache you also get with this laptop to boost the video memory.
Completing the media front is a sound setup with Dolby Home Theatre. Quite simply put, this is the best sound I’ve ever heard direct from a laptop and its inbuilt speakers. I know several dance DJs and producers who were impressed by the clarity from the laptop. Okay, so it’s never going to be perfect, and nothing will take away from hooking it up to a decent amp and speakers/hi-fi/etc – but I’d challenge anyone to find something better built into a laptop.
I’ve only had the laptop for 48 hours, and wanted to share my first thoughts. I can’t really offer a full tried-and-tested review as I’ve only owned it for a very short space of time. As I’ve already said, the quality is brilliant. The specification is awesome. The price point is spot on. This laptop will cater for my needs more than adequately. I’m going to be using it from here on in for both work and day-to-day usage, and will write a fuller review after using it for three or four weeks. I hope that this has given an insight for anyone considering making a purchase, and I can whole-heartedly recommend it!
You want comments? We got comments:
Click here for a RSS Feed to the comments on this entry.











Sewje wrote, on August 6th, 2007:
I’ve had my 5920 since release date in UK, and it still suprises me how fast this laptop is for the price its going for.
I’ve just upgraded my desktop to a Quad Core 2 Duo and while the frame rates of this laptop is obviously slower, the overall load times in Vista totally thrash my desktop, even tho my desktop is running XP.
As much as I hate Vista, its working very nice for me so can’t really complain.
Don’t forget to get the latest BIOS update that just came out recently. it fixes some important things, like full ROBSON/TurboMemory support which boosts overall Vista performance.
Iain wrote, on August 7th, 2007:
I’ll be taking a look at the new BIOS this evening. I’ve also already replaced the stock graphics drivers.
This evening I will also (finally!) get some pics taken and sent over to Michael.
Paul wrote, on August 10th, 2007:
Hi guys,
If you can put some benchmark results here up aswell that would be great.
I am considering buying one too..
How is the display? would you guys prefer a 17inch or is the 15.4 doing a great job as well?
Also is the res 1280*800 enough??
Bye
Paul
Jing wrote, on August 14th, 2007:
Well, with the Acer Stock drivers in 3Dmark06, I got a score of 3188. I can bet this is much higher with the modded drivers I am using now.
15.4 inch is plenty, but the resolution may be disappointing.
Physically, the width of the screen matches that of a 17″ desktop TFT screen (not including bezel), but is about 5/6 the height of the 17″ desktop. Transitioning initially makes you feel like the Acer screen is cramped vertically, but you soon adjust.
Also, games on TFT are best played at their Native resolution. If the screen resolution was 1440×900, this may look better in Windows, but result in a lower frame rate in games. Thus, the solution is to lower the resolution to perhaps 1024×768 get better frame rates.
However, as you noticed, lowering the resolution means that the game is not being played in the native resolution of 1440×900 anymore, thus it appears stretched across more physical pixels.
However, if you require more desktop screen real estate, for heavy spreadsheet use, or photo editing, the screen for the Acer 5920 will not be adequate on a daily basis, you will find it too cramped. For me, a few word documents, powerpoint presentations, some spreadsheets and a little photo editing mean the screen is fine for me.
Iain wrote, on August 14th, 2007:
Paul – I like a nice, high screen res. On a 4:3 monitor, I usually use 1600×1200. That said, that’s using 19″ or 21″ monitors.
I use enough applications at the same time to generally have my start bar at triple normal height and on auto-hide. Using a higher res allows me to have multiple windows opened but not maximised so I can see what’s going on in several apps/windows at the same time.
Obviously the 5920 can’t take such a high res, and there’s noticeably a lot less “real estate”. I’m getting used to this now – and it just means that I alt-tab more often. Having a widescreen as opposed to a 4:3 screen does help me lay a couple of windows next to each other though (or, depending on the apps above and below each other).
Whilst it would have been nice to have a higher resolution, it hasn’t stopped me from doing anything. If I was editing in Photoshop or working with CAD files for any length of time then I’d need a higher res, but apart from that I can’t think of a situation that would absolutely demand it.
Rhov23 wrote, on August 27th, 2007:
I’m using my new 5920 at work with the 1280×800 res, and when I get home I connect my 19″ screen and use whatever resolution I want.
WoWundead wrote, on July 20th, 2008:
im thinking of buying a new acer 5920 im thinking what games it will play like world of warcraft and crisis