How technology screwed up the best headline in the world
- posted by Michael Walsh on April 27th, 2009


- (7)
The Aspire Timeline has been one hell of a sparring partner these past few weeks. First I had to come up with the name itself, then the marketing messages and website content and finally the retail information content (leaflets you’ll find in the stores) that we’re still working on as I write.
When the product description first arrived, the key messages we had to underline were very simple:
-
8 hours battery life
2 kilos
Ultra-thin
The big deal with the Timeline is the duration of the battery. It might not be an ultra-high-end notebook in terms of price but it really has an ace up its sleeve which in many ways makes it absolutely priceless. There’s a whole bunch of technologies at work that together make this one of the most efficient notebooks out there. It practically does away with battery-life-worries.
I’m not sure there’s a single feature of this notebook that hasn’t been studied to make it more efficient.
If any of you are car fans, you can think of the Aspire Timeline series like a Lotus Elise. Colin Chapman’s motto of “add lightness” here has been transformed into “add efficiency”. One of the paragraphs you’ll see in the product leaflets makes this very clear:
From the choice of ultra low voltage processors to the thin, LED backlight LCD panels, every component that consumes power was chosen and laid out to make the Timeline series over 40% more efficient than comparable notebooks.
Once we had the name (for the record, Timeline was chosen from: Aspire Hero – Aspire Ultra (which was chosen for a model of the Aspire One) – Aspire Timeline – Aspire Timeless – Aspire TimeOn), we set to work on the messages knowing that we had to come up with a headline that communicated those three points above in a way that made them stick in the mind.
“Light as your time can be” is the campaign message, which has the dual meaning of lightweight notebook and that with Aspire Timeline, your time just got easier to manage (battery doesn’t run out on you).
But the real killer headline, the one I’m writing this post about, was one we never thought would get approved but the marketing director loved so much it became the teaser headline.
Time=Weight³
You might have to think about it for a while, but basically, the duration of the battery life (8) is equal to the weight of the machine (2) cubed. Of course you can’t convert the units but the maths equates and we had a killer teaser headline which was posted to numerous journalists literally hours after being approved so that they could put the launch event into their schedules.
But then, as the invites were sent out, and the event was confirmed, the phone rang and the boffins from Taiwan gave us the bad news (specs).
-
13.3″ –> 1.6Kg –> up to 8 hours
14″ –> 1.9Kg –> up to 9 hours
15.6″ –> 2.4Kg –> up to 10 hours
WTF? 10 hours??? OK there were no benchmarks and nothing was official but that was the time the technicians had achieved and so that was what our headline had to express.
Now our 2 kilos/8 hours equation no longer worked. Even with a massive asterisk with “depending on configuration” it wasn’t going to hold up to close scrutiny. But the “formula” idea had been created and published so we needed to revise it.
And so it became this:
Time≥Weight³
which thanks to Acer America’s conviction that the American public wouldn’t “get” the whole kilos thing meant the final version which some of you may have seen looks like this:
Time(h)≥Weight(kg)³
which I personally can’t even look at, it’s so bad.
Of course, there are still no official benchmarks to prove any of the duration times the guys from Taiwan had achieved, which means that a) the official word on battery life is “more than 8 hours…” and b) the original headline would have worked fine. Forget about it…
You want comments? We got comments:
Click here for a RSS Feed to the comments on this entry.

TechieDiva wrote, on April 27th, 2009:
I would have to agree with Acer America on this one. I mean who uses those kilo thingies and the metric system anyways….
Michael Walsh wrote, on April 27th, 2009:
What?? Head over to this page on Wikipedia and have a look at all those countries not using the International System of Units.
No, wait, I’ll save you the click: Liberia, Myanmar and the United States.
Three countries out of whopping 203 and I have to destroy a headline as pure as this one?!?!?!?!
OK, I’ll admit cricket might not be the same now that a bowler has to judge 20.12 metres rather than 22 yards every time he does his thing but I’d rather deal with a decimal point than guess the length of a chain (or four rods).
Horse racing is still locked in the ninth century (just how long is a furlong anyway??).
And now I’ve mentioned and described these two ultra high-tech terms, can any of you imperial supporters out there please tell us exactly how you measure an acre?
(answer: one furlong in length and one chain in width has an area of one acre – now go write a headline around that)
TechieDiva wrote, on April 28th, 2009:
LOL,
Nice to see your still around, and with a sense of humor.
Michael Walsh wrote, on April 28th, 2009:
Oh… I’ll always have a sense of humor…
Anditte wrote, on May 18th, 2009:
Oh, so you were the one that came up with “Light.As.Your.Time.Can.Be”
I was very fascinated with the thinking behind this and its teaser tagline.
Your “Time equals to Weight cubed” tagline was much better than the final one used. It was simple, smart and meant a lot.
But once the data changed, I guess your teaser tagline wouldn’t work as well as originally intended. The “Time equals to or larger than Weight cubed” just wasn’t as “concrete” as your original. Once the new data came in, Acer should have scrapped the idea and come up with an entirely new tagline. I bet they would have come up with an equally strong tagline as your orginal.
But we also had a problem here with “Light as your time can be” since they just focused on some of the Timeline’s strong points: Weight and Time. You pointed out that the Timeline was created from a “whole bunch of technologies that worked together to make this one of the most efficient notebooks out there.” It had a long battery life. It wasn’t the lightest, but when partnered with its slimness, it was up there. And, of course, we couldn’t convey too much on the Laminar Wall Jet technology and the ULV Processors because they were from Intel. But they gave us cool and tied well with explaining its long battery life. It was also continues Acer’s atempt to go green (the box mirrors this by being more compact. BTW, why wasn’t there the TIMELINE logo on the box?). We also felt it was a bit confusing.
kunal wrote, on May 22nd, 2009:
Hi,
I really liked the new Acer Timeline 4810t notebook but being a photographer,the only thing that is bothering me is-
Using a core 2 duo ultra low voltage SU9400 1.4 Ghz processor,will it be able to run heavy photo editing applications smoothly like adobe lightroom 2 etc..
I googled a lot but didn’t get any satisfactory answer for the same.I saw your videos on youtube..& thought may be you can tell me..
shutterspeed wrote, on September 1st, 2009:
Hi,
I just bought this laptop 2 days ago and like Kunal, I’m also into photography and use the Adobe Lightroom 2. I haven’t really tried the software much on the Acer. FYI, mine is the Core Solo.